We've detected that Javascript is not enabled. It is required for an optimal survey taking experience.
Please check your browser's settings and make sure Javascript is turned on. Learn how to enable Javascript.

Skip survey header

2_900-930-Gofeld-Treating-Patient-Persistent-Neck-Pain

Image is not set.

Treating the Patient with Persistent Neck Pain

Michael Gofeld, Medical Director, Unika Medical Centre

At the end of the session, participants will be able to:

List common etiologies of chronic neck pain
Differentiate between traumatic and degenerative patterns
Describe approaches in managing chronic neck pain

Please rate the quality of the activity on a scale of 1 star (strongly disagree) to 5 stars (strongly agree).

*This question is required.

Space Cell	Met the stated learning objectives	Enhanced my knowledge	Satisfied my expectations	Conveyed information that applied to my practice	Allocated at least 25% of the time for interaction	Was free from commercial bias?
This activity:	Reset star selection 1 out of 5 stars for This activity:: Met the stated learning objectives 2 out of 5 stars for This activity:: Met the stated learning objectives 3 out of 5 stars for This activity:: Met the stated learning objectives 4 out of 5 stars for This activity:: Met the stated learning objectives 5 out of 5 stars for This activity:: Met the stated learning objectives	Reset star selection 1 out of 5 stars for This activity:: Enhanced my knowledge 2 out of 5 stars for This activity:: Enhanced my knowledge 3 out of 5 stars for This activity:: Enhanced my knowledge 4 out of 5 stars for This activity:: Enhanced my knowledge 5 out of 5 stars for This activity:: Enhanced my knowledge	Reset star selection 1 out of 5 stars for This activity:: Satisfied my expectations 2 out of 5 stars for This activity:: Satisfied my expectations 3 out of 5 stars for This activity:: Satisfied my expectations 4 out of 5 stars for This activity:: Satisfied my expectations 5 out of 5 stars for This activity:: Satisfied my expectations	Reset star selection 1 out of 5 stars for This activity:: Conveyed information that applied to my practice 2 out of 5 stars for This activity:: Conveyed information that applied to my practice 3 out of 5 stars for This activity:: Conveyed information that applied to my practice 4 out of 5 stars for This activity:: Conveyed information that applied to my practice 5 out of 5 stars for This activity:: Conveyed information that applied to my practice	Reset star selection 1 out of 5 stars for This activity:: Allocated at least 25% of the time for interaction 2 out of 5 stars for This activity:: Allocated at least 25% of the time for interaction 3 out of 5 stars for This activity:: Allocated at least 25% of the time for interaction 4 out of 5 stars for This activity:: Allocated at least 25% of the time for interaction 5 out of 5 stars for This activity:: Allocated at least 25% of the time for interaction	Reset star selection 1 out of 5 stars for This activity:: Was free from commercial bias? 2 out of 5 stars for This activity:: Was free from commercial bias? 3 out of 5 stars for This activity:: Was free from commercial bias? 4 out of 5 stars for This activity:: Was free from commercial bias? 5 out of 5 stars for This activity:: Was free from commercial bias?

2. What did you learn or how will this event impact your practice? *This question is required.

3. Please indicate which CanMEDS roles you felt were addressed during this educational activity?

4. Rate the quality of the presentation on a scale of 1 star (poor) to 5 stars (excellent).

Space Cell	Overall Presentation Effectiveness	Content Relevance	Used Effective Teaching Methods
Presenter Evaluation	Reset star selection 1 out of 5 stars for Presenter Evaluation: Overall Presentation Effectiveness 2 out of 5 stars for Presenter Evaluation: Overall Presentation Effectiveness 3 out of 5 stars for Presenter Evaluation: Overall Presentation Effectiveness 4 out of 5 stars for Presenter Evaluation: Overall Presentation Effectiveness 5 out of 5 stars for Presenter Evaluation: Overall Presentation Effectiveness	Reset star selection 1 out of 5 stars for Presenter Evaluation: Content Relevance 2 out of 5 stars for Presenter Evaluation: Content Relevance 3 out of 5 stars for Presenter Evaluation: Content Relevance 4 out of 5 stars for Presenter Evaluation: Content Relevance 5 out of 5 stars for Presenter Evaluation: Content Relevance	Reset star selection 1 out of 5 stars for Presenter Evaluation: Used Effective Teaching Methods 2 out of 5 stars for Presenter Evaluation: Used Effective Teaching Methods 3 out of 5 stars for Presenter Evaluation: Used Effective Teaching Methods 4 out of 5 stars for Presenter Evaluation: Used Effective Teaching Methods 5 out of 5 stars for Presenter Evaluation: Used Effective Teaching Methods

5. Additional Comments:

6. Suggestions for future activities: