8_1255-1310-Allison-Quality-Standards-Medical-Rehabilitation

Image is not set.

Quality Standards for Medical Rehabilitation

Jill Allison, Accreditation Advisor, CARF Canada This presentation will provide a brief overview of person-centred accreditation standards for medical rehabilitation. CARF's international consensus standards for quality are used to accredit over 60,000 programs/sites in 26 countries. At the end of the session, participants will be able to:

Discuss CARF's person-centred accreditation standards
Identify key quality themes for medical rehabilitation services
Explain CARF's consultative approach to accreditation.

Jill Allison is an Accreditation Advisor with CARF Canada who focuses on CARF Aging Services and Medical Rehabilitation accreditation across Canada. Jill earned her MBA from the University of Windsor, and has an undergraduate degree in Health Studies from the University of Waterloo. She has more than two decades of experience in the health sector including in long-term care, home & community care, health promotion, and primary care. As well, Jill has worked as a university instructor, primarily teaching business topics.

Space Cell	Met the stated learning objectives	Enhanced my knowledge	Satisfied my expectations	Conveyed information that applied to my practice	Allocated at least 25% of the time for interaction	Was free from commercial bias?
This activity:	Reset star selection 1 out of 5 stars for This activity:: Met the stated learning objectives 2 out of 5 stars for This activity:: Met the stated learning objectives 3 out of 5 stars for This activity:: Met the stated learning objectives 4 out of 5 stars for This activity:: Met the stated learning objectives 5 out of 5 stars for This activity:: Met the stated learning objectives	Reset star selection 1 out of 5 stars for This activity:: Enhanced my knowledge 2 out of 5 stars for This activity:: Enhanced my knowledge 3 out of 5 stars for This activity:: Enhanced my knowledge 4 out of 5 stars for This activity:: Enhanced my knowledge 5 out of 5 stars for This activity:: Enhanced my knowledge	Reset star selection 1 out of 5 stars for This activity:: Satisfied my expectations 2 out of 5 stars for This activity:: Satisfied my expectations 3 out of 5 stars for This activity:: Satisfied my expectations 4 out of 5 stars for This activity:: Satisfied my expectations 5 out of 5 stars for This activity:: Satisfied my expectations	Reset star selection 1 out of 5 stars for This activity:: Conveyed information that applied to my practice 2 out of 5 stars for This activity:: Conveyed information that applied to my practice 3 out of 5 stars for This activity:: Conveyed information that applied to my practice 4 out of 5 stars for This activity:: Conveyed information that applied to my practice 5 out of 5 stars for This activity:: Conveyed information that applied to my practice	Reset star selection 1 out of 5 stars for This activity:: Allocated at least 25% of the time for interaction 2 out of 5 stars for This activity:: Allocated at least 25% of the time for interaction 3 out of 5 stars for This activity:: Allocated at least 25% of the time for interaction 4 out of 5 stars for This activity:: Allocated at least 25% of the time for interaction 5 out of 5 stars for This activity:: Allocated at least 25% of the time for interaction	Reset star selection 1 out of 5 stars for This activity:: Was free from commercial bias? 2 out of 5 stars for This activity:: Was free from commercial bias? 3 out of 5 stars for This activity:: Was free from commercial bias? 4 out of 5 stars for This activity:: Was free from commercial bias? 5 out of 5 stars for This activity:: Was free from commercial bias?

2. What did you learn or how will this event impact your practice? *This question is required.

Space Cell	Overall Presentation Effectiveness	Content Relevance	Used Effective Teaching Methods
Presenter Evaluation	Reset star selection 1 out of 5 stars for Presenter Evaluation: Overall Presentation Effectiveness 2 out of 5 stars for Presenter Evaluation: Overall Presentation Effectiveness 3 out of 5 stars for Presenter Evaluation: Overall Presentation Effectiveness 4 out of 5 stars for Presenter Evaluation: Overall Presentation Effectiveness 5 out of 5 stars for Presenter Evaluation: Overall Presentation Effectiveness	Reset star selection 1 out of 5 stars for Presenter Evaluation: Content Relevance 2 out of 5 stars for Presenter Evaluation: Content Relevance 3 out of 5 stars for Presenter Evaluation: Content Relevance 4 out of 5 stars for Presenter Evaluation: Content Relevance 5 out of 5 stars for Presenter Evaluation: Content Relevance	Reset star selection 1 out of 5 stars for Presenter Evaluation: Used Effective Teaching Methods 2 out of 5 stars for Presenter Evaluation: Used Effective Teaching Methods 3 out of 5 stars for Presenter Evaluation: Used Effective Teaching Methods 4 out of 5 stars for Presenter Evaluation: Used Effective Teaching Methods 5 out of 5 stars for Presenter Evaluation: Used Effective Teaching Methods

5. Additional Comments:

6. Suggestions for future activities:

Please rate the quality of the activity on a scale of 1 star (strongly disagree) to 5 stars (strongly agree).